Smart QA Academy  All lessons

AI in medical devices · Expert · 13 min lesson

Technical documentation for AI devices: what the notified body and FDA expect

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Articles 11 and 18 and Annex IV, MDR Annexes II and III, FDA PCCP guidance (December 2024), FDA draft AI lifecycle guidance (January 2025)

What you will learn

Key takeaways

Free practice question

Halden Retina's regulatory manager wants an 'AI Act file' kept by the data science team and an MDR technical file kept by quality, each in its own repository. Both describe the intended purpose, but the wording is already drifting.

What does Article 11 paragraph 2 of the AI Act expect?

Two separate files with separate owners.

Not quite. Article 11 paragraph 2 asks for one set of documentation for Annex I Section A products, so two files contradict it.

One set that contains the Annex IV information and the MDR information, with one index.

Correct. Article 11 paragraph 2 requires a single set combining Annex IV content with MDR Annex II and Annex III content.

The AI Act file alone, since it replaces the MDR file.

Not quite. Article 11 paragraph 2 adds to the device documentation and never removes MDR Annex II content.

No file until the application date of the AI Act.

Not quite. The MDR already applies, and Article 11 paragraph 1 requires the file before placing on the market.

Key terms

Official sources

Go further

The full lesson has narrated slides, more scenario questions with explained answers and a simulation.

Open the AcademyWatch on YouTube

Illustrative example. Educational only, not legal advice.