Smart QA Academy  All lessons

ISO 13485 · Expert · 15 min lesson

MDR conformity assessment for auditors: Annex IX, Annex XI and notified body certificates

EU MDR 2017/745 Articles 52 and 56, Annexes IX, X, XI and XII, with Regulation (EU) 2023/607 transition dates and ISO 13485:2016 clause 4.2

What you will learn

Key takeaways

Free practice question

Tessel's project plan PL-02 rev 1 shows: design freeze January, verification March, validation June, label proofs July, CE mark September. It does not state the device class, the conformity assessment route or any notified body step. The product is a class IIb powered suction unit.

What is the main gap?

The plan has no conformity assessment route or notified body step, which Article 52 requires for a class IIb device.

Correct. Article 52 requires class IIb devices to go through Annex IX or Annex X with XI, so the plan must include it.

The plan has too many boxes for a small company.

Not quite. The number of boxes is irrelevant; Article 52 requires a conformity assessment step regardless.

Label proofs should come before validation.

Not quite. The order of label proofs is not the gap; the missing Article 52 conformity assessment is.

A CE mark in September is too early for any device.

Not quite. Timing of a CE mark depends on completing Article 52 assessment, so the date itself is not the main gap.

Key terms

Official sources

Go further

The full lesson has narrated slides, more scenario questions with explained answers and a simulation.

Open the AcademyWatch on YouTube

Illustrative example. Educational only, not legal advice.