Smart QA Academy  All lessons

MDSAP · Expert · 14 min lesson

The audit report package - AU F0019.1 report, F0019.2 grading form, guidelines G0019.3 and G0019.4, policy P0019 and P0027

MDSAP AU F0019.1 sections 1 to 18, AU F0019.2, AU G0019.3, AU G0019.4, AU P0019 and MDSAP AU P0027 section 5, ISO 13485:2016 clause 5.6

What you will learn

Key takeaways

Free practice question

Marlowe's report describes in section 11.6 a missing batch record check, but section 12 lists no matching nonconformity and the grading form shows two nonconformities while section 12 lists three.

What is the correct reading?

The report and the grading form are inconsistent; the manufacturer should ask the auditing organization to reconcile them.

Correct. Guideline G0019.3 requires every NC in section 12 to appear on the grading form, so a mismatch is a package defect to raise.

Both are correct because the grading form lists only major findings.

Not quite. The grading and exchange form under guideline G0019.4 lists all nonconformities of any grade, not only major ones.

The manufacturer should edit the grading form to match.

Not quite. The grading form belongs to the auditing organization under MDSAP policy, so manufacturer edits would break the approved record.

Regulators will reconcile it themselves, so no action is needed.

Not quite. Regulators receive the package as submitted under MDSAP AU P0027, and an unreconciled record weakens its value to them.

Key terms

Official sources

Go further

The full lesson has narrated slides, more scenario questions with explained answers and a simulation.

Open the AcademyWatch on YouTube

Illustrative example. Educational only, not legal advice.